PSYCHOPHYSICAL CORRESPONDENCES BETWEEN the MARIE and KIERA PERSONALITIES
Genotype/Phenotye. A comparison of the above Kiera H. photograph
and Marie Antoinette portrait reveals a very strong physical
similarity. Application of the biometric technique described in The Soul Genome and elsewhere
on this site reveals that the underlying bone structure differs by a
very small percentage. This correspondence of facial geometry suggests
that these two women, separated by two centuries, are more
genotypically like one another than any other person in their
respective lifetimes.
They appear to have the same body types,
hair patterns, ear forms, and hand-finger proportions. Problems in one
of Marie Antoinette's legs are mirrored in Kiera.'s left leg. Kiera H.'s nightmares described above began about age two after a fall that
left a scar on her forehead. Interestingly, it is in the same area
where Marie Antoinette bumped her head descending stairs going from the
Temple prison to the Conciergerie for the trial that resulted in her
execution. In many cases it has been confirmed that physical events in
the present lifetime mimic scars or other marks from the alleged
previous life. Biometric similarities and these unique features suggest
the likelihood of a psychoplasmic carry-over (embedded in the inherited
genotype) of energetic patterns from one life to another.
In
addition to this genotype summary of matches between Marie Antoinette
and Kiera H. (referred to subsequently as M-I and M-II respectively),
confirmed matching personality factors will be added below as they
become available.
Cognitive Cerebrotype. Based on
historical descriptions and more recent biographical studies of M-I's
personality and life and M-II's written documents and professional
assessments through interviews, we can compare the cognitive or mental
profiles of the two women. Please refer to page 5 of the research packet by clicking on this link, where the rating forms can be printed out.
Both
women have a similar mode of thinking: much more Emotional than
Rational. They favor an intuitive approach to looking at life and their
experience. While grounded in Traditional worldviews of their
respective religious cultures (Catholicism and New Age spirItualism)
each possesses an Experimental nature receptive to unconventional ideas
of the age. In M-I's case, she was interested in Mesmerism and its
research in the subtle energies. M-II is proficient in acupressure,
psychotherapy, hypnotherapy, and numerology, and is a Reiki master and
yoga teacher.
Regarding the Reactive/Disciplined scale, both
thrive on the stimulation and reinforcement of others. Their
intellectual openness makes them receptive to new ideas; they avoid the
discipline necessary to create from scratch. Both focus on the
Particular, especially on their own personal circumstances and the
pursuit of their own agendas. Neither devotes much attention to a
Global perspective in either political or social terms. Their mental
life strongly tends more in the direction of Impulsive than Reflective.
They are credulous, immediately responding to external stimuli (people
and circumstances). They accept new ideas quickly, open to those who
present different and intriguing ideas.
Emotional Egotype.
While both can be Cool, detached, and diffident about their immediate
environment, they can also become quite passionate about their
interests, emotionally and seductively Warm. Each has a self-Confident
streak that borders on stubbornness. They are strong-willed, determined
to follow their own inclinations. Each is individualistic and
non-conformist. While they can be Depressed, the prevailing mode is
towards continuous activity, almost at the level of Manic. Easily
bored, they must be active, needing immediate satisfaction.
Their
innate predisposition is impatience, coupled with an Anxious
trepidation that leads to delay in making bold moves (as in M-I's
hesitancy to escape during the French Revolution and M-II's plan to
publish her reincarnation story). A stranger to others, each has
difficulty defining themselves or knowing just how they fit into their
environment. A Pessimist streak results in a fear of both the future
and having nothing to do in the present. This is overcome by filling
the present with activities of immediate interest and possible
distraction. Aware of this possible legacy M-II works to mitigate this
immobilizing trait.
Interpersonal Personatype. In their
interpersonal style, neither is very Timid. They are more Uninhibited,
willing to follow their own priorities and inclinations. Energized by
spontaneity, they cannot abide the imposition of routines or rituals
imposed by society. Their pride will not let them easily bend to the
wishes of others. They balance this pride and even disdain for others
with a fresh, fragile appearing intimacy to gain their own way. Both
energetically serve their own agenda, aggressive in defense of their
own priorities.
Independent, they are capable of scorn or
contempt for those close to them, husbands and others. Defiance of the
expectations of others is almost an absolute trademark. Not easily
pliable; the more they are pushed the more they resist. While some see
them as Extroverted, both are basically mistresses-of-self and very
private, distrusting of those outside their intimate circle. M-I is
skeptical of others, very secretive. M-II exhibited the same tendency
early, but now tries to mitigate being too Skeptical.
(NOTE: In
terms of inter-rater reliability, the scores of two independent raters
varied from the same or adjacent blocks on the rating scales only twice
among the 15 items rated. This suggests a high degree of reliability
for the biographical material assessed.)
|
|